Allowing creators to send direct appeals against demonetization is definitely an improvement, but it isn't the fundamental change in transparency the platform needs.
When your concern is with the inconsistency of practice rather than the practice itself, you’re not a good-faith actor in the fight against Big Tech power, but an opportunist seeking to use said power for yourself.
8chan users who want to use Zeronet are concerned they will accidentally wind up distributing child pornography.
YouTube doesn’t tread lightly when it comes to quick enforcement and reinstatements, and it’s doubtful that's going to change when the platform thrives on monetized conflict, whether obscure or mainstream.
The would-be currency has generated a host of alarming questions, among them anti-trust and privacy considerations.
Former employees claim Facebook's "Stormchaser" and "Night's Watch" tools were used to crackdown on viral posts that portrayed the platform and its top executives in a negative light.
Democrats are up in arms over the Russian-created FaceApp but tech experts say it is no worse than countless Silicon Valley apps.
The 30-page report conveniently focuses on flawed business on the platform rather than the platform’s own inherent business flaws.
Ultimately, the platform is stuck between being an ineffectual monopoly or being a legitimate platform willing to filter out the echo chambers of its users and enforce comprehensive rules as a community.
Twitter will label "abusive" tweets but won't delete them.
