FBI: Obama Admin. Overlooked Russian Uranium Bribery

Conspiracy

Resist the MSM’s attempts to keep you staring at the bright, shiny lights blinding you from the real Russia-America collusion narrative. Revelations that fake, Russian-originated accounts allegedly bought $100,000 worth of advertisements on Facebook to sow the seeds of political division will be pushed to further the narrative that Vladimir Putin and his cronies somehow helped Donald Trump steal an election.

The entire narrative has been nonsense from the beginning. But more than mere falsehood, it has been used by Democrats, the DNC in particular, and their allies in the media to serve as disinformation. At first, it served as a distraction from the fact that Julian Assange said himself that the Russian government was not the source of the DNC email leaks. This admission by Assange, the undeniably suspicious and still unresolved murder of suspected DNC-leaker Seth Rich, and the ongoing saga of Pakistani IT-aide to former DNC chairman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz are just the main reasons why those who do their research never bought the Russia hacking narrative from the beginning.

But now, FBI documents have exposed that the Russia collusion narrative was accurate. Only, the collusion appears to be between Russia and the Obama administration. And, the issue being colluded over was not some minor, intangible influence upon an election or the hacking of a DNC server - a server which, by the way, we increasingly fail to mention was criminally instituted in the first place. The collusion appears to be the willful allowance of ‘bribery, extortion, and money laundering schemes’ that would ultimately allow Russian interests to gain a 20% stake in American uranium reserves.

Surely it’s just a coincidence, but the ultimate Uranium One deal that resulted in that 20% stake was tied to a boatload of donations to the Clinton Foundation. As is their M.O., donations to the Clinton Foundation by Uranium One stakeholders and other Russian entities came in return for ‘speaking fees,' $500,000 worth of them, to be precise. Because, as we have learned, Billary’s speeches, their mere words, are worth more than four or five years’ worth of work put into even a highly-achieving professional’s career.

Or could it be that those aren’t ‘speaking fees,' but ‘government influence fees,' otherwise known as bribery?

It doesn’t take a genius to answer that question correctly and honestly, but it does take an objective observer. Unfortunately, even those with the brainpower to connect the dots lack the willingness, or perhaps even the ability at this point in the political warfare which plagues American politics, to overcome their partisanship; the ability to see that it was not Donald Trump, but Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, that colluded with Russia to undermine American interests.

After all, it was the former President that had to approve, and surely oversaw, the dealings that led to the passage of the Uranium One deal, which handed those scary Russians one-fifth of American uranium reserves. Don’t take my word for it, take the FBI’s.

(by the way, it’s amazing how much has been accomplished since that Comey guy was removed from his post as Chief Investigation Inhibitor)

Per Zero Hedge, who did the legwork of compiling the FBI documents’ most damning excerpts, along with admittedly unbiased reporting from The Hill and the New Yorker, it’s clear that the Uranium One deal was one plagued by corruption from the start. And not just Russian corruption, but American corruption, too. This must have been what former-President Obama meant when he told former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev he’d have more ‘flexibility’ after his election:

Before moving into the nitty-gritty of the FBI reports, here are the inside workings of the Uranium One deal, including how Russia came to control Uranium One, first exposed in the eye-opening documentary Clinton Cash.

‘Russian Purchase of US Uranium Assets in Return for $145mm in Contributions to the Clinton Foundation - Bill and Hillary Clinton assisted a Canadian financier, Frank Giustra, and his company, Uranium One, in the acquisition of uranium mining concessions in Kazakhstan and the United States.  Subsequently, the Russian government sought to purchase Uranium One but required approval from the Obama administration given the strategic importance of the uranium assets.  In the run-up to the approval of the deal by the State Department, nine shareholders of Uranium One just happened to make $145mm in donations to the Clinton Foundation.  Moreover, the New Yorker confirmed that Bill Clinton received $500,000 in speaking fees from a Russian investment bank, with ties to the Kremlin, around the same time.  Needless to say, the State Department approved the deal giving Russia ownership of 20% of U.S. uranium assets.’ (Zero Hedge)

But, the revelations in the newly-released FBI affidavits prove that the Obama administration was aware of the illegal funneling of money to the Clinton Foundation, and that it would be used in the process of brokering a deal that would give Russia unprecedented influence in America’s uranium reserves, not to mention America, period.

As reported by The Hill:

‘Before the Obama administration approved a controversial deal in 2010 giving Moscow control of a large swath of American uranium, the FBI had gathered substantial evidence that Russian nuclear industry officials were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering designed to grow Vladimir Putin’s atomic energy business inside the United States, according to government documents and interviews.’

The FBI knew that the deal was rife with bribery, kickbacks, extortion, and money laundering, so surely the President knew. Bribery that would directly benefit the Foundation whose name was donned by the acting Secretary of State. And yet, the Uranium One deal was approved. If that’s not collusion, if that’s not government-approved criminality at its highest levels, what the hell is?

Despite FBI awareness of financial improprieties and willful criminal activity within the facilitation of the Uranium One deal in April 2009, the deal was approved in October 2010. And, all along, Clinton and Obama insisted there was ‘no evidence’ of wrongdoing or any reason for the deal to be opposed.

I know, you must be shocked. I do, in fact, mean to tell you that the Clintons and former-President Obama have not been completely honest with you; that they lied to you, and continue to do so. And, I mean to tell you that their behavior with respect to the Uranium One deal is criminal. And that this criminal behavior is not an anomaly, but a pattern.

Foreign powers used proxies to donate hundreds of thousands, if not millions, to the Clinton Foundation for ‘speaking fees,' as ½ of that Foundation’s namesake oversaw State Department deals and contracts. The former-President remains, in most cases, willfully obstinate, and in this case, well-aware of these conflicts of interest which directly threaten Democracy, and potentially even American sovereignty.

Hopefully, the FBI’s conclusions will finally lead to the legal repercussions that such betrayal by the highest-ranking officials in our American government warrants. We’ll believe it when we see it, but boy oh boy, do we want to believe it.

Around The Web